Talk:Instakill

This is an unnecessary article; there is probably already a list of instant kills somewhere, and if there isn't, it will be added shortly and therefore does not warrant its own article. Besides, only one instance of an instant kill is listed on this article. If there is only one time to do it, it definitely should not have its own article. Instead, this should be included into something about Tactics in general, though it probably already is mentioned somewhere. - §tigma-231 ¤ ৳ here's a hole in my neighbourhood [ talk  ][ cont ] 23:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

i agree with stigma this article is pointless and should be deleted for all the reason stigma has mentioned above as this doesnt add anything "new" that isnt on any of the other pages. Spygon 09:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I disagree. I beleive that it is useful information that should be passed on. It provides information that can be used for stratagy in the game and provide awareness of these spots either to use them themselves or to stop their opposition of taking advantage. If this is going to be deleted then the information should at least be moved into a different page, such as Tactics Playing As Infected User:siric312 12:50, 02 Febuary 2009 (UTC)
 * Quite. If there are more instances, I could definitely see taking this information and distributing it across an article or two, within reason.  I'll admit, it is useful...but it doesn't quite warrant its own article as of yet. - §tigma-231  ¤ ৳ here's a  hole  in my neighbourhood [ talk  ][ cont ] 06:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)