Talk:Obtaining achievements

Useless
The achievements page already has semi-strategies for getting the achievements. This page is useless because of that. --HarrisonH 20:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Sadly the achivements strategies on the Achievements are badly written by one person that seem to not have really looked into them and most of them are total rubbish i agree that does make this page useless but i think we should remove the badly written ones from the achieve page and keep this page--Spygon 11:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Second harrison, this page is useless, the achievements are described enough on the other page. ATF Dispenser 13:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the deletion of this page. It's vastly redundant. - Stigma-231 † God is dead • [ talk  ] [ cont  ] 06:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok.... You know, it would really help the wiki if we had bureaucrats that were active once in a while. I have yet to see either of the two active! -- Five Dog ( Talk ) 23:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Psh, I'm pretty much an equivalent to a bureaucrat. I can delete articles and stuff.  I just marked it for merging to get a community consensus on it. - §tigma-231  ♠ o  ƒ  my caliber { τalk }{¢ont } 00:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought merging and deletion was only within the bureaucrats' abilities - good to hear it's not. -- Five Dog ( Talk ){ Updates } 17:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Special:Log/delete, Special:Log/block. :P Sysops and Bureaucrats, so far as I can see, aren't very different.  If you wanted to get technical, you'd have to look it up, I'm sure it's on the Help Wiki, or something.  But I can delete and everything, yeah.  Merging isn't just something limited to admins, either; regular users can do it, I believe.  Just redirect the pages correctly. - §tigma-231  ♠ o  ƒ  my caliber { τalk }{¢ont } 17:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Delete?
Sure, why not. It is redundant. Ðash † God is dead † [ Home ][ talk ] 01:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)